From
January 18, 2009

Movie may renew interest in Richard Yates

Public could discover American author’s books through seeing Winslet and DiCaprio in award-winning film Revolutionary Road

Revolutionary Road Illustration

For nearly 50 years, Richard Yates has been the best-kept secret in American fiction. Largely ignored by the general public — even that dwindling percentage of it that reads books — he has been praised by writers such as Richard Ford and Kurt Vonnegut as being every bit the equal of household names such as Updike, Mailer and Bellow. Some have even gone so far as to call him the true inheritor of F Scott Fitzgerald’s mantle as America’s premier stylist. The hushed reverence used to describe his work is usually accompanied by baffled speculation as to why this writer is not more famous.

The upcoming release of a big-budget film version of Yates’s greatest novel, Revolutionary Road, could finally put an end to this obscurity. Although the book has often been optioned for production since its publication in 1961, it took the high-octane producer Scott Rudin — who reportedly had wanted to film the novel since he was a teenager — and the star power of Leonardo DiCaprio and Kate Winslet, under the A-list direction of Sam Mendes, to finally bring it to the screen. Not that any of this matters to Yates, who died impoverished and alone while living in a dingy apartment in Alabama 17 years ago, an end more fitting to one of his woebegone characters than to one of the finest prose writers of his era.

So why has a writer held in such high regard by peers, critics and a small band of devoted readers failed to find a permanent place in the reading public’s imagination? One clue might be the man himself, whose immense talent was often matched by an equally prodigious appetite for personal and professional self-destruction. Richard Walden Yates was born in 1926 in suburban New York City, and from the very first it seemed as if he was destined for a life of misery. His father, a sales manager for General Electric, was a largely absent figure in the boy’s life, leaving him to be raised by an overbearing, alcoholic, artistically pretentious mother, who suffocated young Richard with a toxic brew of affection and neuroses. After being packed off to boarding school, Yates was drafted into the army and served in the second world war. He spent the post-war years working in hated white-collar jobs, including writing promotional copy and speeches for a business-machine corporation.

Meanwhile, the budding writer suffered a string of rejections from magazines and publishing houses. Stints as an expatriate in Paris and London failed to jump-start his career; a bout of tuberculosis deepened his melancholy and sense of isolation. As early success eluded him, he increasingly sought relief in alcohol, though this only exacerbated his struggles with ill health and depression, as well as contributing to the ruin of two marriages.

Yates fervently hoped his breakthrough would come with the publication of his first book, Revolutionary Road, which tells the story of a restless couple leading lives of quiet desperation in the 1950s Connecticut suburbs. As with most of Yates’s fiction, it was deeply autobiographical. The novel’s hero, Frank Wheeler, was in many ways a mirror image of the author, a man with powerful artistic yearnings who felt smothered by the bourgeois blandness of Eisenhower’s America. Yet despite high expectations on the part of both author and publisher, the book garnered mixed reviews and mediocre sales, and Yates’s bitter disappointment was deepened by its failure to win the National Book Award after making the shortlist.

Following this setback, Yates’s mental problems became more acute, as did his drinking. Although his financial situation was eased somewhat by a university teaching job in New York City and work as a speechwriter for Bobby Kennedy, it took him eight years to complete his next novel, A Special Providence. That, too, failed to elevate Yates into the literary Valhalla, where royalties flow freely and awards are there for the picking. A 1965 screenwriting pilgrimage to Hollywood to work with the independent film-maker Roger Corman ended in disaster, with Yates

suffering a breakdown on Sunset Boulevard that landed him in a psychiatric ward. A residency at the celebrated Bread Loaf Writers’ Conference, in Vermont, also concluded early after the binge-drinking author climbed onto a dormitory roof and started screaming that he was Christ.

The next two decades saw Yates enduring increasingly less glamorous faculty positions in places such as Kansas and Alabama, as well as spending time in a variety of mental institutions for alcohol-related ailments. Friends and colleagues recall him as a man capable of considerable grace and charm who became monstrous when afflicted by the twin demons of alcohol and depression. He got into the habit of getting drunk and placing threatening late-night phone calls to editors who had rejected his work — not the best way to rescue a faltering career. As Blake Bailey memorably describes in his excellent 2004 biography, A Tragic Honesty, Yates in his later years was often indistinguishable from a street person, living in filthy, “crepuscular” flats, smoking 100 cigarettes a day and sporting a beard often “matted with drool and snot”. Time and again, he was rescued from the abyss by friends, colleagues and ex-students. A somewhat less harrowing portrait of the Yates of this era is provided by the Seinfeld creator Larry David, who briefly dated Yates’s daughter Monica and used the gruff, bearded author as the basis for the character of Elaine Benes’s novelist father. Though Yates continued to write through these painful times, creating several unforgettable short stories in the process, his work never “broke out” from a small circle of followers. He died in obscurity in 1992.

Although this is hardly the sort of life that would lend itself to success in our career-savvy times (it’s hard to picture Yates on Oprah’s sofa, at least for very long), there is more to his inability to reach a wider readership than just this deep self-destructive streak. Even more limiting has been his reputation for being unremittingly bleak; possibly the finest, Yates is no doubt his generation’s saddest fiction writer. Though his novels and stories are set in a time when most of America seemed to be on the rise — economically, socially, sexually — his focus remained unwaveringly on those mired in the depths of failure and depression.

And this emphasis was never more piercing than when his subject was his own broken soul. Writers often use their misfortune and pain to fuel their work, but Yates perfected this process. The philosopher Kierkegaard defined a poet as an “unhappy person who conceals profound anguish in his heart but whose lips are so formed that as sighs and cries pass over them they sound like beautiful music”. If this is true, Yates could have been one of the Three Tenors. The critic Robert Towers suggested that it was “as if Yates were under some enchantment that compelled him to keep circling the same half-acre of pain”. Yates himself was acutely aware of this tendency, addressing it head-on in his remarkable short story Saying Goodbye to Sally, as a struggling writer contemplates his crippling gloominess. “What saved him. . . was his knowledge that any number of sanctimonious people had agreed to hang that bleak and terrible label on F Scott Fitzgerald too.” Even if the comparison to Fitzgerald is apt, it takes a sturdy reader to endure the blasted lives that populate a novel such as The Easter Parade, the story of two sisters whose lives seem to be nothing more than attempts to outdo one another in misery.

Another reason Yates never broke through to the front rank of American literature was that he was often at odds with the prevailing taste of his era. The 1960s and 1970s saw a radical shift in literary fashion from the plain-spoken realism in which Yates traded to the “experimental” forms of writers such as Robert Coover and John Barth. Unwilling to adapt his prose and subject matter to changing times, Yates stubbornly adhered to the spare, simple style he’d honed as a chain-smoking, hard-drinking young man. This cost him dearly, especially in the review pages of New York magazines and newspapers, where he was pigeonholed as a relic of a bygone era. Even today, some speak of Yates in the same breath as writers such as John O’Hara, as nothing more than a correspondent from the era of suburban conformity, nuclear families and the “man in the grey flannel suit”. At his best, however, Yates easily transcends this stereotype. His depictions of the Wheelers, or the aptly named Grimes sisters in The Easter Parade, are no more restricted to their time than Fitzgerald’s rendering of Gatsby and the Buchanans is to the 1920s. After all, literary fashions come and go — who reads Coover and Barth now?

It remains to be seen if the film of Revolutionary Road finally lifts Yates into the forefront of contemporary American fiction, though it would be ironic if Hollywood, a world Yates saw as fatally sunny and dishonest, were to prove his saviour. The true measure of a breakthrough, however, will come after the final credits, when readers seduced by Kate and Leo’s dazzling full-colour beauty turn to the book and are confronted by Yates’s world rendered in the grim, unforgiving black and white of the printed page.

Best of Yates

Revolutionary Road (1961)

Yates’s best book. Picture-perfect in its rendering of the malaise at the heart of the American Dream, it is also a timeless portrait of youthful disillusionment.

The Easter Parade (1976)

In many ways the equal of Revolutionary Road, though probably too bleak for some people’s tastes. Reading Yates’s story of two promising sisters whose lives devolve into heartache and missed opportunities is like listening to a scratchy Edith Piaf record on a rainy day.

Liars in Love (1981)

Yates’s best story collection. The title story memorably depicts a young American writer’s affair with a working-class prostitute in a post-war London gripped by an “evil-smelling sulphurous fog that stained everything yellow, that seeped through closed windows and door to hang in your rooms and afflict your wincing, weeping eyes”.

Eleven Kinds of Loneliness (1962)

His first collection of stories from the 1950s. Has ever a writer titled a book more aptly?

Revolutionary Road opens on January 30

From
January 11, 2009

2666 by Roberto Bolano

Calling Roberto Bolano’s 2666 a novel is somewhat misleading. Certainly, it bears many attributes of a work of long fiction – memorable characters, richly evoked locations, abundant action, recurrent themes. Nevertheless, the author is clearly working against the genre even as he labours within it; at times, he turns the common conventions of the novel on their head, whether by exiling a character that the reader has come to identify as a protagonist, or amputating storylines just as they start to pulse with life. The fact that the book remains as riveting as any top-notch thriller is testament to Bolano’s astonishing virtuosity.

Perhaps 2666′s sad provenance is the reason for this narrative disquiet. Completed just before Bolano’s death in July 2003 at the age of 50, it was provisionally intended to be five separate books, although the author’s executors and editors decided posthumously to bring it out as a single work. It was the right decision. Read as a whole, 2666, whose enigmatic title is never explained in the text, achieves something extremely rare in fiction: it provides an all-encompassing view of our world.

The novel opens in Europe, where four literary scholars are brought together by a mutual obsession with Benno von Archimboldi, a prolific but elusive German author. A chance meeting leads them to a minor Mexican novelist known as El Cerdo (the Pig), who claims to have spent a chaotic day with Archimboldi in Mexico City as the great writer was en route to the fictional border city of Santa Teresa (which bears a strong resemblance to Ciudad Juarez). After travelling there, the scholars find scant trace of their prey, though they do discover that a serial killer has slaughtered hundreds of young women in the city over the past decade.

As Archimboldi’s trail runs cold, Bolano does what young novelists are told never to do – he drops his protagonists for new ones, in this case a Chilean scholar named Amalfitano, who has washed up in Santa Teresa with his teenage daughter, and an African-American journalist known as Oscar Fate, who has come to Mexico to cover a boxing match, only to become fixated by the murders. “No one pays attention to these killings,” Fate believes, “but the secret of the world is hidden in them.” In one of the novel’s more remarkable moments (and that’s saying something), his investigations lead him to a terrifying confrontation with the main suspect in a desert prison.

Abandoning Fate, Bolano once again changes tack to give us the history of the murders. Although a weary police detective named Juan de Dios Martinez might be called this section’s protagonist, the real hero (or antihero) is the city of Santa Teresa itself, a teeming dystopia in which the bodies of raped and mutilated young women are discovered almost weekly, often in garbage dumps surrounding the low-paying factories that manufacture cheap goods for American consumption. While some of the cases are domestic disputes or collateral in the drug trade, most seem to be the work of a sadist working out of an expensive black sedan. The authorities hope a high-profile arrest will quell rising fear and resentment, although any sense of relief is tempered by the fact that the killings continue after the suspect is banged up in prison.

Bolano then comes full circle in the book’s last section by returning the focus to Archimboldi, presenting a remarkable biography of the writer from his birth in pre- Nazi Germany to his life as an itinerant cult novelist who possesses little more than a laptop and a backlist. Any sense that Bolano has gone off track is dispelled in the novel’s final pages, when the author miraculously draws together plot lines that seemed almost fatally irreconcilable.

What is most memorable about 2666 is the sheer abundance of its narrative. Bolano mints characters with a spendthrift generosity, though there is nothing preening about this breadth of scope. A Mexican seer who describes the world as being “a kind of tremor”, an English artist whose most popular work contains his own severed hand, a former Black Panther who writes cookbooks, a prodigiously endowed Romanian general – it is sometimes easier to think of this book in terms of who is not present, rather than who is.

Bolano is equally unstinting with his subplots, which spring organically from the novel, like the colourful offshoots of a rampant tropical plant. Perhaps the most memorable of these comes in 2666′s final section, which details Archimboldi’s service in the German army during the second world war. While in Romania, he finds himself stationed in a castle that might have been the home of Count Dracula. There, he witnesses an act of brutal lovemaking that seems to conjure the vampire’s ghost. Later, while a prisoner of war, he hears the harrowing confession of a fellow soldier that serves as a bitter distillation of the general slaughter that has just decimated the world.

It is in stories such as this that the world of 2666 can be best experienced – one that is equal parts beauty and violence. When Professor Amalfitano arrives in Santa Teresa, he remarks that “the sky…was purple like the skin of an Indian woman beaten to death”; when a German officer visits the site of the massacre of Jews he has reluctantly ordered, he cannot bring himself to stare into the abyss of the mass grave. “From now on,” he thinks, “this is the realm of the insects.”

The novel’s most representative story comes when Amalfitano leads the European scholars on a wild-goose chase to a shabby circus simply because it features a German magician who might be their vanished author. “Examined coolly, it was a stupid idea…but the critics were in such low spirits that he thought it wouldn’t hurt.” In an era where number-crunching publishers are turning out one coolly formulaic book after another, this awe-inspiring three-ring extravaganza of a novel is sure to raise a reader’s spirits as much as any Mexican circus.

Power Play
Shadowy forces in Washington cloak their dirty deeds in patriotism.

Reviewed by Stephen Amidon
Sunday, January 11, 2009; BW07

THE RULES OF THE GAME

By Leonard Downie Jr.

Knopf. 320 pp. $26.95

As the case of Rod Blagojevich demonstrates, people involved in politics can sometimes view the rules of their game very differently from the rest of us. The Illinois governor was allegedly so convinced that there was nothing wrong with selling a Senate seat that when an FBI agent called to say he was about to be arrested, Blagojevich asked if it were a joke.

Leonard Downie Jr.‘s savvy first novel, set in contemporary D.C., captures this atmosphere of ethical relativity. Downie, the former executive editor of The Washington Post, writes about the corridors of power as if they all lead to an exclusive back room at a Vegas casino, where several high-stakes games are in progress, each watched over by a remorseless security team with an agenda all its own.

The newest player in town is Sarah Page, a young reporter at the Washington Capital newspaper. After cutting her teeth covering the Maryland state house, where she distinguished herself with her doggedness but also landed in hot water for sleeping with a senior colleague, Sarah is moved to the paper’s vaunted national political team to cover the money side of the game. Her first assignment is to take a hard look at veteran consultant Trent Tucker, a “walking conflict of interest” who treads a fine line between getting politicians elected and lobbying for corporate interests. Tucker is currently the chief strategist for Monroe Capehart, the aging Democratic nominee for the presidency who has just chosen an attractive younger woman, California senator Susan Cameron, as his running mate.

It doesn’t take Sarah long to uncover all sorts of dirty dealings on Tucker’s part, most notably his entanglement with Carter Phillips, a retired Special Forces general who now runs a shadowy defense contractor called Palisar International. Sarah’s digging reveals that Phillips and Tucker have set up an elaborate scheme in which subcontractors “pay to play” by kicking back a portion of their government largesse to the legislators who award them contracts, with Palisar serving as a well-paid middle man. After a House staffer who was Sarah’s chief informant is killed by a hit-and-run driver, she realizes that she has stepped through the looking glass into a political netherworld where “ideological purity [is] folly,” money and national security are the only absolutes, and no one except her editor is to be trusted. The plot becomes even thicker when it turns out that the kickback scheme is just the tip of an iceberg that involves some of the more extreme practices of our intelligence services in the war on terror.

The Rules of the Game is an engrossing read whose main value is its cunning take on the twisted gamesmanship that underlies Washington politics. Despite often resembling a pack of underfed hyenas, Downie’s characters all see themselves as playing by rules that are fundamentally ethical. Tucker might look like a garden-variety conman, but in his own mind he is only practicing a time-honored tradition that greases the wheels of a broken-down government. Phillips, meanwhile, seems to be a war criminal in the making, though from another angle he is simply serving a country that demands radical measures against its foes and yet doesn’t have the stomach to ask what’s happening behind the interrogation room doors. Even Susan Cameron, with her sterling integrity and flawlessly progressive agenda, played some ruthless matrimonial hardball to take over the Senate seat of her disgraced ex-husband. These often tangential ethical pathways create an elaborate maze for Sarah to negotiate, even as she plunges down a few blind alleys of her own.

While Downie’s fictional abilities are not always up to his political sophistication — his style is never more than pedestrian, and he allows a few of his storylines to wither on the vine — The Rules of the Game remains a persuasive piece of storytelling. Given the author’s pedigree, it is hardly surprising that the book has a strong whiff of authenticity. Downie’s best scenes involve meetings in which the give-and-take of Washington power is dramatized: a newspaper publisher standing up to the CIA after being summoned to Langley, a lawyer striking a plea arrangement for a client, a congressman and reporter delineating the limits of the personal and professional before jumping into the sack.

Most impressive, however, is Downie’s creation of Sen. Cameron, the fetching young political superstar who dons “a fitted royal blue jacket and skirt that subtly highlighted her figure” while delivering a convention speech that trashes her geriatric running mate’s opponent. Either Downie is astonishingly prescient, writing this before the advent of Sarah Palin, or he managed to do it afterward, in which case he is astoundingly fast. Whichever it was, her creation is evidence that we’re watching a real pro at work. ·

Stephen Amidon’s new novel, “Security,” will be published in February.